Data Analytic Investments
RIPPLE book coverRIPPLE — the book·numbered first edition·$9.99Buy now
Research

South Korea's central bank digital currency, Project Hangang: nine banks, 500 thousand wallets, and an opposition leader's privacy warning — what is documented

On 14 September 2026 the leader of South Korea's opposition People Power Party said he 'strongly opposes' introducing a CBDC until legal safeguards are in place. This article sets his statement against the record of Project Hangang: two pilot phases, seven then nine banks, up to 500 thousand wallets, and a wholesale design that never gives consumers a central-bank account.

D
DAI Research Desk
5 min read
South Korea's central bank digital currency, Project Hangang: nine banks, 500 thousand wallets, and an opposition leader's privacy warning — what is documented

A central bank digital currency, or CBDC, is money issued by a central bank in digital form. The phrase covers two very different designs. In a retail design, people hold accounts or wallets with the central bank directly. In a wholesale design, the central bank issues digital money only to commercial banks, and the public deals with those banks as before. South Korea's Project Hangang is the second kind. On 14 September 2026 it drew a public warning from the country's main opposition party. This article records both the warning and the project it is aimed at.

🎧 Audio edition — the full article read aloud, 6 minutes, MP3: south-korea-cbdc-hangang-2026-09-audio-EN.mp3

What was said on 14 September

Crypto.news reported at 06:59 UTC on 14 September that Jang Dong-hyeok, leader of the opposition People Power Party, had issued a statement opposing the introduction of a CBDC. Two sentences are quoted verbatim.

The first: "I strongly oppose the introduction of CBDC until legal and institutional safeguards are perfectly established so that the public can feel safe."

The second: "While there is a view that CBDC is a new technology capable of enhancing payment convenience and efficiency, we should not rush into it solely because of its convenience."

According to the same report, Jang raised four questions: who would have the authority to track transactions, whether spending could be restricted, whether digital money could carry an expiry date, and whether consumers would keep the choice of how to pay. He did not, in the reporting we have seen, cite a specific provision of the pilot that does any of those things. The questions are about what a CBDC could be designed to do, not about what Project Hangang has been shown to do.

What Project Hangang is, in numbers

The Bank of Korea's project, as described by Crypto.news, is wholesale central-bank money supporting tokenised deposits issued by commercial banks. Consumers do not get a central-bank account.

Phase one ran from April to June 2025. Seven banks took part, with up to 100 thousand participants.

Phase two began in 2026. It expanded to nine banks, added peer-to-peer transfers and biometric authentication, and set a ceiling of up to 500 thousand wallets. The nine banks named in the report are KB Kookmin, Shinhan, Woori, Hana, Industrial Bank of Korea, NongHyup, Busan, BNK Kyongnam and iM Bank.

The report also cites a 9.6 billion won programme supporting deposit-token payments. At the exchange rates of mid-September 2026 that is a modest sum for a national payments experiment; we do not convert it, because the source does not, and the figure's purpose is scale rather than cost accounting.

Where stablecoins come in

The same policy roadmap pairs the deposit-token pilot with planned rules for won-denominated stablecoins. The Bank of Korea's position, as reported, is that regulated bank consortiums should lead won stablecoin issuance in the first instance. That is the point of contact between the two debates: a bank-issued tokenised deposit and a bank-issued stablecoin look similar to a user, and the question of which one the law prefers is, in practice, a question about who gets to run Korea's digital payment rails.

Readers who followed our record of the tokenised equities milestone on Base will recognise the same tension from the other side: private networks moving traditional assets on-chain, while public institutions decide how much of that to allow.

What the record does not show

Three things are missing from the sources as of 14 September. A response from the Bank of Korea or the government to the opposition statement. Any published privacy-impact assessment of phase two, or a description of what transaction data the central bank sees under the wholesale design. And a date for any decision to move beyond the pilot; the reporting describes an experiment, not a launch.

The gap between "could" and "does" is where this story will be decided. A wholesale CBDC in which banks hold the customer relationship is, on paper, no more of a surveillance tool than the banking system that exists today. Whether that stays true depends on rules that, by the opposition leader's own account, have not been written.

How we read announcements like this

Our company does not issue, hold or trade digital currencies, as the About page sets out. We document them. The Crypto Academy is where we teach the vocabulary of this field, so that words like stablecoin, tokenised deposit and CBDC stop being interchangeable; Market Observation carries the sourced market data behind the assets these policies touch. If the Bank of Korea publishes a phase-two report, we will read it and record what it says.

Sources

  • Crypto.news, "South Korea CBDC plan draws warning over privacy risks", 14 September 2026, 06:59 UTC — Jang Dong-hyeok's two verbatim sentences, the four questions, the Project Hangang phase details, the nine banks, the 500 thousand wallet ceiling, the 9.6 billion won programme, the stablecoin roadmap and the Bank of Korea's stated position.

Educational content. Not investment advice.

Explore Topics

#CBDC#South Korea#Bank of Korea#Project Hangang#privacy#stablecoin#tokenized deposits#regulation
D

Written by

DAI Research Desk

Content creator and writer sharing insights and stories.

Share · Megosztás:XFacebookLinkedInWhatsAppTelegramE-mail

Related Research

Hong Kong's 2026 Policy Address on digital assets: the three paragraphs that commit to something, and the dates in them
Research

Hong Kong's 2026 Policy Address on digital assets: the three paragraphs that commit to something, and the dates in them

The Chief Executive's 2026 Policy Address, delivered on 16 September, contains three numbered paragraphs on digital finance: 35 on digital bonds and tokenised Exchange Fund Bills, 49 on virtual-asset licensing, tokenised gold and regulated stablecoins, and 50 on CBDC settlement under EnsembleTX by around the end of 2026. This article quotes the text, lists the dated commitments, and marks what is a plan rather than a rule.

5 min readDAI Research Desk
#Hong Kong#Policy Address#stablecoin
The SEC's Innovation Exemption for tokenized US stocks: what the 17 September order permits, what it requires, and what it leaves for later
Research

The SEC's Innovation Exemption for tokenized US stocks: what the 17 September order permits, what it requires, and what it leaves for later

On 17 September 2026 the US Securities and Exchange Commission issued a temporary, conditional exemption letting Tokenized Securities Venues trade tokenized NMS stock through automated-market-maker pools. This article documents the conditions, the limits, the five-year expiry and the comment request as the SEC's own release and Commissioner Uyeda's statement describe them.

6 min readDAI Research Desk
#SEC#tokenized stocks#tokenization
Revolut handed customer passports and Bitcoin transaction histories to a fake government request: what is confirmed, what is not
Research

Revolut handed customer passports and Bitcoin transaction histories to a fake government request: what is confirmed, what is not

On 12 September 2026 Revolut confirmed that an unauthorised third party used a legitimate government agency email domain to submit fraudulent data requests, and that the company answered them. Identity documents, selfies, addresses, account statements and Bitcoin transaction histories of a 'limited' number of customers were handed over. This is a documentary record of what Revolut said, what the researcher who first reported it said, and what remains unknown.

5 min readDAI Research Desk
#Revolut#data breach#Bitcoin